Título: | NARRATIVE AND EVALUATION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PEDAGOGIC KNOWLEDGE: A SOCIAL-CULTURAL AND SOCIAL-SEMIOTIC PERSPECTIVE | |||||||
Autor: |
ADRIANA NOGUEIRA ACCIOLY NOBREGA |
|||||||
Colaborador(es): |
LUCIA PACHECO DE OLIVEIRA - Orientador |
|||||||
Catalogação: | 31/JUL/2009 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
|||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | |||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
|||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=13947&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=13947&idi=2 |
|||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.13947 | |||||||
Resumo: | ||||||||
The purpose of this study is to investigate narratives of personal
experience produced in the classroom, focusing on this discursive practice as a
locus for the process of social construction of pedagogic knowledge. The
theoretical architecture built in this research is based on the social-cultural theory
(Wertsch, [1995]2006, 2002; Daniels, 2001; Wells & Claxton, 2002) developed
from Vygotsky’s principles ([1984]1998, 2001); the systemic-functional approach
(Halliday & Hasan, 1989; Halliday & Matthiessen, 1999; Eggins, 2004), which
considers language as a semiotic mediating tool in the (co)construction of
pedagogic knowledge; and the social constructionist notion of narrative as social
practice (Bruner, 1994, 2002; Moita Lopes, 2001b; Bastos, 2004, 2008). Six
aspects are considered to classify narrative discourse: spontaneity,
unconsciousness, integration with pedagogic discourse, narrative time, evaluation,
and reportability. Evaluation is examined under two theoretical paradigms:
sociolinguistics (Labov & Waletzky, 1967; Labov, 1972; Linde, 1997); and
appraisal theory (Martin, 2001, 2006; Martin & White, 2005). Fragments of postgraduate
Pragmatics lessons offered at a university in Rio de Janeiro were selected
as instantiations of narrative practice. One professor, nine master’s and eight
doctoral students, including the researcher herself, took part in this study as
narrative interlocutors. The analysis follows a qualitative methodology based on a
social-historical approach (Freitas, 2002; André, 2001). The selected extracts were
analyzed concerning their connection to pedagogic discourse, Labov’s (1972)
narrative structure, and evaluative aspects, which turned out to be highly relevant
in the process of meaning negotiation. Results of the analysis also show the
multifunctional nature of narrative practices in the pedagogic setting, as well as
specific features of classroom narratives, which act as a two-way route in the
process of social construction of pedagogic knowledge. Through the telling of
experiences in personal stories, formal (educational/pedagogic) knowledge is
constructed and, in return, it helps the narrator understand the lived experience,
joining the individual to the collective.
|
||||||||