This research deals with the issue of political representation system capillarity, particularly of political parties in a context in which it is possible to observe an explosion of political demands from multiple new subjectivities. In this sense, the GLBT Movement will be presented as a case study, in two dimensions of their struggle. On one hand, a dimension marked by a diffuse power, which crosses the cultural order, and is expressed in disputes discursive that want to determine the truth, and therefore the standards of acceptability, social normality. The LGBT Pride Parade, a festive event that aims to give visibility to the Movement, is an example of political strategy in this dimension. On the other hand, it has been a territorial struggle that requires in the name of equal access to certain features - the rights, already fixed and targeted to heterosexual - as well as the implementation of new rights by the recognition of the legitimacy of their differences. These dimensions are mutually involved in a dynamic that can be seen under political party. The rules, that govern political parties as institutionalized territory, undertake a universal agenda in accordance with widespread social aspirations, not signaling the capillarity to specific demands, such as GLBT. However, their politicians dialogue with the Movement, what emphasizes an individual political calculation.