My aim is to investigate the collapse and abandonment of the Tractatus held as a project to develop the attractive picture of a logic completely combinatorial, syntactical and neutral. There is in this project an unsolvable tension between this image of a neutral logic and the demand that it must be used to completely analyze the facts in the world. There are more logical connections than the tractarian logic, with its tautologies, contradictions and truth-functionality, can express. Thereby I deal here with four unavoidable collapses of Tractatus maininterdependent pillars, namely: I) the Compositionality; II) the truth tables; III) the Bildkonzeption; and IV) the Neutrality of Logic. There are four central points that I cover respectively in this investigation: 1) Problems with a truth-functional expression of colors and numbers, and its relation with functional and spatial intuitions; 2) the central role and limits of the truth tables as a special notation to reveal the essence of the language and to avoid absurdities; 3) a criticism of the recurrent interpretation of an isomorphism between elementary propositions and atomic facts in the Tractatus; and 4) the central role of a tractarian holism which forms the background to the unavoidable collision between logic and its application. I highlight then the kind of conceptual invasion of empirical arrangements and elements in the (allegedly) neutral domain of logic. Logic could not at last take care of itself.