Título: | ERGONOMICS APPROACH ON PEDESTRIAN CROSSING | |||||||
Autor: |
GIUSEPPE AMADO DE OLIVEIRA |
|||||||
Colaborador(es): |
ANAMARIA DE MORAES - Orientador |
|||||||
Catalogação: | 04/FEV/2010 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
|||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | |||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
|||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=15114&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=15114&idi=2 |
|||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.15114 | |||||||
Resumo: | ||||||||
This thesis is about the risk behavior adopted by pedestrians at crosswalks
with traffic light equipament. It was observed that many pedestrians take risk to
cross the Presidente Vargas Avenue. This avenue is located in downtown in Rio
de Janeiro city and has a heavy vehicular traffic and intense pedestrian flow.
Many pedestrians cross the four lanes of avenue dangerously disobeying the
traffic light indications. To conduct this research about pedestrian s behavior at
crosswalks, a model developed by American researchers - Wogalter, Dejoy and
Laughery (1999) - known as Communication-Human Information Processing
Model - C-HIP Model was used. This model is organized sequentially in seven
stages. The initial stages are about how information are transmitted by a source
and the intermediary and final stages allow to investigate how a person receives
and processes the message in order to be committed to adopt a desired behavior.
Investigating the stages by C-HIP model perspective, using methods and
techniques for each stage, enabled to identify which factors can contribute to
pedestrians to disobey traffic signs and adopt a risky behavior in pedestrian
crossing. The main methods applied observation and inquiry techniques.
Systematic observations were made to investigate the pedestrians’ attention and
their behavior. Rating Scale were applied to investigate how are related the
pedestrians’ traffic education with their beliefs, motivations and behavior. The
comprehension of graphic elements were studied through the test of graphical
symbols (ISO 9186). The data were processed and analyzed using methods of
inferential statistics (Pearson s correlation and Qui-squared). Later, seven respondents took part in a semi-structured interview session to gather
information that would not be possible through quantitative methods. It was
considered that the main contact form with traffic education was orientation
coming from family. The pedestrians have an optimistic belief about their
capacity to evaluate the right time to cross the lanes and the hurry is one of the
main motivating factors for disobeying traffic law. The results showed that
pedestrians use mostly as source of information coming vehicles from the lanes
and the men behaved in a more insecure way and observed the lanes more than
women. The female pedestrians observed ahead (pedestrian traffic light) and
respected more the traffic light indications than men. It was revealed that the
acceptance s level of the crosswalks and traffic light s symbols is accepted by the
ISO 9186 index. It was concluded that the pedestrian more confident in their
ability to evaluate the crossing moment or who is hurried has a tendency to take
risk while crossing the avenue. Finally, it was suggested future studies in graphic
design with C-HIP model approach to investigate the whole communication
process.
|
||||||||