Companies define their branding strategy in order to maximize profits, increase competitiveness and, as a result, their market value, which is, in its turn, composed by the company´s both tangible and intangible assets. The corporation s competitive edge is less and less based on its tangible assets - such as inventory, facilities, equipments and machinery - focusing on efforts to create value through intangible assets. Recent studies display evidence that intangible assets have been responsible for creating additional value for a company, the brand being the most relevant asset. In spite of numerous researches in branding, corporations have their own interpretation of the best branding strategy, hence the various ways to manage brand portfolios, with various denominations, even among companies operating in the same market. Regarding those aspects, this research aimed to analyze the impact caused by the deployment of a certain branding strategy in a company s intangible value, through a multiple linear regression model, developed by Rao, Agarwal and Dahlholf, which uses Tobin´s quotient (Tobin´s q) as a dependent variable to measure the intangible assets and an array of independent variables that interfere in their value. The present study was based on a sample of 83 companies operating in the Brazilian market and negotiated in São Paulo´s stock exchange (BOVESPA), between 2003 and 2005, and considered the branding strategy taxonomy used by the authors mentioned, which include three categories: Corporate, House of brands and Mixed. The results point that the model is robust, showing that branding strategies, and the control variables, cause impact in a company´s intangible value. However, the coefficients shown for each of the independent variables, and also for the branding strategies, differ from those found in the research developed in the USA. The House of Brands strategy turned out with a positive connection, rejecting the initial hypothesis that such strategy would be connected to a negative coefficient. On the other hand, the value associated with the Corporate strategy´s coefficient turned out positive, resonating with the suggested hypothesis, though in an inferior amplitude than House of Brands´. That particular point was not part of the North-American research, showing how the evaluations of the two markets differ from one another. The study indicates, among other aspects, that investors and consumers weight differently both branding strategies and the control variables used.