| Título: | 4E ANALYSIS OF PHOTOVOLTAIC POWERPLANT: MONOFACIAL AND BIFACIAL POWER CELL COMPARISON | ||||||||||||
| Autor(es): |
VITOR MACEDO RODRIGUES MALLMANN |
||||||||||||
| Colaborador(es): |
FLORIAN ALAIN YANNICK PRADELLE - Orientador |
||||||||||||
| Catalogação: | 15/DEZ/2025 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||
| Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | SENIOR PROJECT | ||||||||||
| Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
| Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/TFCs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=74569@1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/TFCs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=74569@2 |
||||||||||||
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.74569 | ||||||||||||
| Resumo: | |||||||||||||
|
Photovoltaic power has set itself as one of the few sustainable ways to
generate energy with enough scaling potential to match the challenges that the
environmental crisis proposes. In this context, the objective of this work is to
analyze the potential and competitiveness of bifacial photovoltaic panels through
mathematical simulation in Matlab software. Their implementation to meet the
energy demands of a housing complex in Rio de Janeiro is analyzed in comparison
with the use of monofacial cells. To this end, meteorological data provided by
INMET and average per capita consumption data, both hourly defined, were used
to estimate the performance of four different configurations, using both types of
modules and the presence or absence of a battery storage system. In order to analyze
them holistically, a 4E analysis, focusing on energy efficiency, exergy, economic
profitability, and the environmental impacts of each combination, was developed.
With the intent of getting a more complete scope, the 4E approach was chosen,
focusing on Energy and Exergy efficiency as well as Economic rentability and
Environmental impacts. The results showed that bifacial modules generated on
average 39 percent more energy using an area 13 percent lower and achieved 10 percent higher
efficiencies on average for both energy and exergy. All systems with energy storage
showed worse results from a financial perspective, however, their independence
from the grid reduced emissions by almost 13 percent, more than 2 tons of CO2
equivalent, when analyzing their cradle-to-grave emissions. When comparing
combinations of mono- and bifacial systems and on- and off-grid systems, the
bifacial system without energy storage performed best.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||