Título: | NATIONAL PACT FOR LITERACY AT THE RIGHT AGE (PNAIC) IN 2019: THE RESISTANCE MOVEMENT TO MAINTAIN THE CONTINUED TRAINING OF LITERACY TEACHERS | ||||||||||||
Autor: |
GISELA GUEDES DUARTE S DE OLIVEIRA |
||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
MARIA INES GALVAO FLORES MARCONDES DE SOUZA - Orientador |
||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 21/MAI/2025 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=70513&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=70513&idi=2 |
||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.70513 | ||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||
This thesis aims to analyze how the resistance movement to uphold the
National Pact for Literacy at the Right Age (Pacto Nacional da Alfabetização da
Idade Certa - PNAIC) was developed in the State of Rio de Janeiro in 2019. This
process was developed mainly through a collaborative process involving
representatives from educational institutions, such as the Federal University of Rio
de Janeiro (UFRJ), the State Department of Education (SEEDUC/RJ), and the
Union of Municipal Education Directors (UNDIME). This initiative emerged from
a revised version of the continuing education policy. This, in its turn, sought to
sustain discussions on school literacy with/among literacy teachers and establish a
state network of literacy specialists. Additionally, the study investigates the actions
undertaken to implement the PNAIC during this period, from the perspective of
those who coordinated the collaborative framework between universities and
municipal education departments specifically, local coordinators from six
municipalities in Rio de Janeiro that adhered to the PNAIC. Their insights are
crucial for understanding the challenges and limitations of this continuing public
education policy. This qualitative research employed two data collection
instruments: an online questionnaire (Google Forms) and a supplementary online
interview (Google Meet) with selected local coordinators who had previously
responded to the questionnaire. The theoretical framework draws on official PNAIC
guidelines and published works by leading researchers and authors in education,
literacy, and public policy, including Ball, Candau, Freire, Gatti, Nóvoa, Tardif,
Soares, and others The data analysis maintains a continuous dialogue with these
researchers and authors. In this regard, the findings highlight the significance of this
continuing education policy throughout the years of its implementation and,
specifically, in 2019. They reveal both an act of resistance in the effort to
reconfigure approaches to teacher education for literacy educators, and the positive
impacts on the professional development of these teachers and on the learning outcomes of early childhood students. The results suggest that the PNAIC/RJ continuing education initiative in 2019 represented the continuation of a large-scale public educational policy, albeit with structural changes, directly contributing to the articulation between basic education and public universities. Furthermore, it enabled local training needs and experiences to be taken into account during the professional development process, supporting municipalities in the development of local literacy policies and contributing to broader discussions and actions aimed at shaping new literacy education policies. Finally, the findings underscore the urgent need to invest in continuing teacher education as a priority condition for ensuring students right to quality education, while respecting teachers knowledge and experiences and grounding the training process in a perspective that values the
protagonism of literacy educators.
|
|||||||||||||
|