Título: | THE QUESTION OF LANGUAGE IN PAUL’S EPISTLES TO THE ROMANS AND CORINTHIANS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autor: |
GUILHERME LIMA CARDOZO |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
HELENA FRANCO MARTINS - Orientador |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 06/MAR/2014 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=22594&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=22594&idi=2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.22594 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The present work aims to investigate in what way Paul makes a
perspective of language emerge from the Scriptures, focusing on his Epistles
written to the Romans and Corinthians. It is tested the hypothesis that there is a
pragmatic perspective of language in these Epistles. Special emphasis is given to
two interconnected aspects: the way with which Paul approaches, using
metaphors, the presence of metaphors in the Scriptures; and the way that the issue
of the unspeakable and the apophatic genre manifest in his Epistles. The analyses
of selected passages shows mainly that (a) although there are passages in which
metaphor is put in the discourse as a kind of ornament, or lure, as a way of
obtaining the understanding and attention of listeners, just as classic Aristotelic
theories predict, the Apostle, with the tension between letter and spirit, breaks
away from the ideas of the primacy of literalness and intrinsic word meaning, in
many occasions where metaphor, considered not only as mere agent of aesthetic
or rhetoric impact, appears as a resource that enables an indirect approach to God
– which is something that brings Paulo’s perspective closer to later theories of
metaphor in which it is taken as a founding phenomenon; (b) in order to approach
the theme of the divine, Paul attributes to it the characteristic of ineffability, in
accordance with some Greek intellectuals who preceded him; however, in his
discourse, the unsayable can part off with the unknowable and be probed by
humans, as long as they free themselves from the letter that kills, once only
through the spirit men can know God – who is Spirit – face to face; (c)
rendering the unspeakable acknowledgeable, through the activity of the spirit,
does not mean, unquestionably, making it sayable.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|