Título: | REPRESENTATIONS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE COURSEBOOKS: ANALYSIS OF THE DISCOURSE OF PRODUCERS AND USERS FROM A SYSTEMIC-FUNCTIONAL APPROACH | |||||||
Autor: |
RENATO CAIXETA DA SILVA |
|||||||
Colaborador(es): |
BARBARA JANE WILCOX HEMAIS - Orientador |
|||||||
Catalogação: | 22/OUT/2012 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
|||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | |||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
|||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=20597&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=20597&idi=2 |
|||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.20597 | |||||||
Resumo: | ||||||||
This thesis investigates the representations of English language coursebooks
that are socially constructed by their producers (authors and editors) and their
users (teachers and students). Systemic-functional linguistics and knowledge
about representations from Cultural Studies and Social Psychology constitute the
theoretical basis of the study, from a view of social construction of reality. More
specifically, a semantic-discursive analysis and the grammar of visual design,
both based on the systemic-functional theory of language, serve as guides for the
discourse analysis. Using these theories, the thesis takes the English coursebook
as a genre that is present in Brazilian educational culture and that carries other
genres in itself; it is also an object of representation due to its political, economic,
cultural and pedagogical relevance in society. Thus, this study presents an analysis
of English coursebook producers’ discourse in five separate series, considering
three genres written by authors and editors: catalogue advertisements, back cover
blurbs and teacher’s manual introductions. The study also analyzes the users’
discourse through 12 interviews with teachers who adopt volumes from these
series, and 116 questionnaires answered by their students. The coursebooks are
adopted by five different teaching institutions located in Belo Horizonte and Rio
de Janeiro. This research is qualitative, characterized by multiplicity, and it uses a
constructivist approach in the sense that the explicitness of the representations is
expressed in the everyday use of language, which the analytical procedure
identifies, categorizes, and systematizes from the recurrent verbal and non verbal
elements in the corpus. This is one of the contributions of the research. The
analysis indicates that producers and users, in general, represent the English
coursebook as a source, an agent, the course, and an attraction. In the coursebook
producers’ discourse, guide and facilitator are less recurrent representations. On the other hand, the analysis of the users’ discourse shows that teachers still
represent the coursebook as an organizer, a base, a piece of merchandise, and a
possibility. Differently from the producers, users (teachers and students), more
recurrently, see the coursebook as a facilitator and a guide. The study shows that
the same meaning resources, or similar ones, contribute towards the construction
of the representations in and through language, and that the representations are
themselves inter-related. These meaning resources are ideational, interpersonal
and textual ones, and this suggests representations are not limited to ideational
aspects of language only. Furthermore, this research also suggests these
representations regulate coursebook producers’ and users’ social practices. The
pedagogical contributions of the study may be the application of the knowledge
produced here for teacher education; a greater awareness of the discourse on the
English coursebook that might help in materials evaluation and coursebook
selection processes; and a starting point for future investigations on the topic.
|
||||||||