Título: | THE EVALUATIVE DIMENSION OF ARGUMENTATION IN THE OPINATIVE SPEECH BY PROFESSIONALS AT A COMPANY IN PROCESS OF CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autor: |
AMITZA TORRES VIEIRA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
MARIA DO CARMO LEITE DE OLIVEIRA - Orientador |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 19/OUT/2007 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=10729&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=10729&idi=2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.10729 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From theoretical budgets on argumentation (Shiffrin, 1987;
Wegman,
1994; Gryner, 2000; Gille, 2001) allied to studies which
deal with opinative
speeches (Shiffrin 1990; Shi-xu, 2000) and researches
developed in the scope of
evaluation (Labov, 1972; Linde, 1997; Martin, 1999, 2003),
this study looks into
the evaluative dimension of argumentation in opinative
speech by professionals at
a company in process of change. The study methodology
takes into account the
analysis of interviews given by four employees of the
company towards their
evaluation of the organization administrative group and of
their own possibilities
to act in this context. The data analysis found out the
appearance of standards that
identify the evaluation as an argumentative move, and
unveiled as well the
evaluative marks that pervasively occur in the
argumentation structure of the
opinion discourse by the informers of this research. The
results also show that
evaluation may assign opinion by the exchange of author
and animator roles
(Goffman, [1979] 2002, 1981), besides the possibility of
being shaped in
sustaining through inferential syllogism based on factual,
hypothetical or fictive
narratives (Oliveira, Bastos e Pereira, 2007).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|