Logo PUC-Rio Logo Maxwell
ETDs @PUC-Rio
Estatística
Título: THE EVALUATIVE DIMENSION OF ARGUMENTATION IN THE OPINATIVE SPEECH BY PROFESSIONALS AT A COMPANY IN PROCESS OF CHANGE
Autor: AMITZA TORRES VIEIRA
Colaborador(es): MARIA DO CARMO LEITE DE OLIVEIRA - Orientador
Catalogação: 19/OUT/2007 Língua(s): PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL
Tipo: TEXT Subtipo: THESIS
Notas: [pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio.
[en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio.
Referência(s): [pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=10729&idi=1
[en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=10729&idi=2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.10729
Resumo:
From theoretical budgets on argumentation (Shiffrin, 1987; Wegman, 1994; Gryner, 2000; Gille, 2001) allied to studies which deal with opinative speeches (Shiffrin 1990; Shi-xu, 2000) and researches developed in the scope of evaluation (Labov, 1972; Linde, 1997; Martin, 1999, 2003), this study looks into the evaluative dimension of argumentation in opinative speech by professionals at a company in process of change. The study methodology takes into account the analysis of interviews given by four employees of the company towards their evaluation of the organization administrative group and of their own possibilities to act in this context. The data analysis found out the appearance of standards that identify the evaluation as an argumentative move, and unveiled as well the evaluative marks that pervasively occur in the argumentation structure of the opinion discourse by the informers of this research. The results also show that evaluation may assign opinion by the exchange of author and animator roles (Goffman, [1979] 2002, 1981), besides the possibility of being shaped in sustaining through inferential syllogism based on factual, hypothetical or fictive narratives (Oliveira, Bastos e Pereira, 2007).
Descrição: Arquivo:   
COVER, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, RESUMO, ABSTRACT, SUMMARY AND LISTS PDF    
CHAPTER 1 PDF    
CHAPTER 2 PDF    
CHAPTER 3 PDF    
CHAPTER 4 PDF    
CHAPTER 5 PDF    
REFERENCES PDF