Título: | HOW MANY THREADS TO WEAVE A REFLECTION? NARRATIVE AND ARGUMENTATION IN THE LOOM OF INTERACTION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autor: |
ISABEL CRISTINA RANGEL MORAES BEZERRA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
INES KAYON DE MILLER - Orientador |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 31/AGO/2007 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=10477&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=10477&idi=2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.10477 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
According to the Exploratory Practice Principles, for
professional reflection to be
meaningful, it must be deeply related to the puzzling
questions formulated by those
involved in the process. Therefore, this thesis makes its
contribution to the area of EFL
in-service teacher education as it focuses on the process
of co-construction of knowledge
and professional reflection developed with some colleagues
in a language course where I
got involved in an exploratory consultancy activity. Using
the principles of Exploratory
Practice to carry out this inherently discursive
reflection process of making sense of life
in the classroom (and outside of it) allowed us to
prioritize quality of life, everybody´s
involvement and union, and mutual development - even
though it was possible to spot
moments of conflicting meaning negotiation. I emphasize
that the process of working to
understand became hybrid inasmuch as the academic research
side was also present and
involved my colleagues as well. Hence, the discursive
configuration of our reflective
sessions brought about discussion of our teaching and
learning beliefs, identity
construction moments, just to name a few issues, while we
tried to make sense of our own
teaching practice. Discourse is a central issue in this
thesis in the meaning negotiation
processes concerning who we are, the social world where
discursive practices come to be,
particularly, the discursive construction of reflection.
Within the format of our reflective
study sessions, narratives and argumentations were woven
in the loom of interaction via
Reflective Activities with Exploratory Potential to work
for deeper understandings of our
puzzles. Thus, the micro-discursive analysis of the face-
to-face interactions took these
two elements to respond to the questions or puzzles that
led my research-consultant look.
Finally, I also want to highlight that, in this thesis, I
did not only direct my attention to
my colleagues´ discursive action, but also to mine,
especially in the consultant role. I
believe that turning the focus to my discursive action has
added to the construction of a
space in the epistemological field that is devoted to
professional consultant reflection on
his/her own professional practice.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|