Título: | POST-PRIVATIZATION COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES FOR FIXED TELEPHONY SWITCHED SERVICES (STFC) CONCESSIONAIRE COMPANIES IN BRAZIL: A CASE STUDY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autor: |
DARIO BALESDENT FILHO |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
JORGE FERREIRA DA SILVA - Orientador |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 08/JUL/2004 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=5158&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=5158&idi=2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.5158 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The telecommunications industry in Brazil had been through
significant
changes during the mid-1990's and the beginning of the 21st
century, due to a
new regulation and the privatization of the state-owned
telephony monopolistic
operators. These regulatory changes caused a major
transformation in this
industry's competitive environment and in the recently
privatized operators
competitive strategies.
This dissertation seeks to identify changes in the
competitive environment
by means of a more detailed analysis of a privatized
operator, this company's
competitive strategies and performance indicators through a
comparison of two
distinct periods - before (1996-1998) and after (1999-2003)
the privatization.
In order to identify the competitive strategies, the
selected company was
classified under 20 strategic variables, according to
Porter's (1980) typology.
The research is based on interviews with current and former
employees from the
selected company, its competitors and the industry's
consulting firms.
During the period that preceded the privatization process
(1996-1998), the
company's strategy can not be classified under Porter's
(1980) typology due to
the monopolistic regime in which the company provided its
services, although it
was possible to infer that the company's strategy seems
closer to a differentiation
strategy than other generic strategies. On the other hand,
during the period
following the privatization (1999-2003), the company
positioned itself on a
differentiation strategy, although some adopted tactics
might diverge from this
positioning.
In spite of successfully adopting a differentiation
strategy, the company's
results have decreased, as shown by a comparison of
performance indicators
from both periods. These poorer results after the new
regulation are mainly due
to a much more hostile competitive environment than before.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|