The current study, presented in the form of two articles, has as its general purpose to look into the specifics of the psychologist listening in special depositions with children and teenagers victims of sexual abuse within the family. The interest came from the experience in criminal hearings, assisting children that participated to testify about sexual abuses suffered. Regarding that, there was a positioning from the Conselho Federal de Psicologia, that issued notes not recognizing the psychologist participation in this practice for it is not listening, but questioning, a proper legal instrument. Having as trigger the mentioned context, we have attempted to ponder about the possibilities of the psychologist to make interventions of psychic care to the victims of sexual abuse, in the special deposition, maintaining the listening of the subjectivity, at the time of the testimony in trial. To achieve the general purpose of the study were examined five videotaped audiences, having its content analyzed. The matters that emerged from the narratives of the victims, as well as from the interaction between them and the psychologist in the hearing, were discussed in two articles titled Ethics of care in Special Deposition: interventions of the psychologist and preservation of subjectivity and Beyond the testimony: demand of trauma reparation in the Special Deposition. As a result of this broad study, we realized that the psychologist listening has a fundamental function in this field of the special hearing, because it acts in the register of the ethics of caring, offering a listening sensitive to the subjectivity of the child/teenager victim that can enable an intervention of psychic support and open space to a narrative witnessed and protected from trauma; the testimony of the trauma experimented by the victims migrates from the objective to the subjective field of the law, when there is a sensitive listening that validates the momentum of the pain in testimony and the experience of the abuse. We also recognized that may emerge from that experience demands for the process of symbolization of the trauma that need a presence involved in the ethics of care.