This paper consists of analysis about the effects of what may be called new technologies on not-white bodies and experiences when exercising their autonomy, more precisely algorithmic biases derived from Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems applied to digital products and services. In a global scenario of intense connectivity, associated with sophisticated AI techniques and predatory use of personal data, racial discrimination dynamics is being reproduced, reinforced, and hidden in search platforms and engines, monitoring politics, and products and services access. There is an efficient belief in law and technology neutrality. In the Brazilian scenario, this belief still shows allied to sharing the myth of racial democracy, narcissistic pacts, and racism denial, in a way that confronting racial inequalities by techno-regulation, algorithmic governance, or even to the light of ethical-legal challenges is still devoided. To explore the algorithmic racial bias phenomenon, it is proposed a reflection about coloniality effects in the intersection between law and technology from the Amefricanity politician-cultural category, developed by Lélia Gonzalez. Starting from the premise that law and new technologies keep being read and built on whiteness sign behind supposed neutrality and formal equality: a place of privilege related to not-identified raciality. Under a formal inequality mantle kept by law, the supposed indifference of algorithms and automatons in face of racial identity of individuals reproduces a devilish use of ethnic-racial characteristics as an exclusion mechanism. Right normative construction and ethical values that surface the construction of technological governance, in turn, are produced from the experience included in the being zone. From the Amefrican perspective ingrained in Brazilian experience, it is intended to offer a narrative that re-establish the role law performs and ethical-legal challenges on violence processes found on the not-being zone in digital environment.