From 2009 on, with the editing of Resolution n° 70, authored by the National Council of Justice (CNJ), Quality Policies were implemented in the Brazilian Courts of Justice in order to confer more quality to their activities of delivering jurisdiction, in order to better attend the citizens users of the system of Justice, as well as to facilitate people s access to Justice. This dissertation aims at exposing political, institutional and social factors that would have led to the perception of the need for an administrative reform within the Judiciary and at analyzing the agenda of CNJ under the challenges and expectations posed to the Judiciary, in a democratic context, since the promulgation of Brazilian Constitution of 1988. The work presents the main points of CNJ s agenda of administrative reform for the Judiciary, and dedicates special attention to the System of Targets, that emerges as the central element of the Quality Policies implemented by CNJ. The work compares Targets 01 and 02 in relation to the objective of celerity, and thinks of how they serve the interests of the Judiciary as an institution, the interests of the parties figuring in the processes and the interests of the Brazilian society in general. Finally, the work portrays the limits of the celerity policy adopted by CNJ and reminds the readers that there are other exit strategies available for the problem of access to Justice, such as the ones indicated by Cappelletti & Garth and by the authors of Wisconsin School in researches about the theme.