On the unforgettable forgetfulness of the Other s voice: the voice object in psychoanalysis is an investigation on the voice object in psychoanalysis. Because the voice was raised to the status of drive object by Lacan, we start our research from his indications about this concept. Therefore, we turn back to Freud, trying to identify his own formulations on the matter of our experience with the voice, until we discover the voices of the superego, which is one of the foundations upon which Lacan creates the concept of the voice object. Such object does not refer to the sound of the voice, but to the subjective experience of being struck by the undetermined of invocatory drive. Amongst the characteristics of the voice object, we postulate that the most specific one is the fact that the subject cannot escape from what is presented as the voice of the archaic Other. This has led us to suggest that, when it comes to other objects, the experience of the voice object is the one which mostly approximates the subject to the jouissance of primal continuity between the subject and the Other, reassuring how unforgettable it was to enter this continuity. Whereas the neurotic subject, through his own deaf point, could forget the voice of the Other, deafening himself, the psychotic subject keeps being struck by this unforgettable voice through hallucinations. However, due to the contingencies of life, the deaf point can become inoperative to the neurotic, and he can start to be vociferated by the excess of the superego. Thus, in both cases, we can suggest that music - listened, sung or played -, which is involved in transfer work, can be presented as a way to provede jouissance and forgetfulness of the Other s voice, as well as we can locate jouissance and reaffirms how unforgettable it is to enter in the jouissance of the Other.