According to Jacques Rancière, the political is the encounter of two distinct process: the police, an implicit law that determines the hierarchical distribution of places and functions inside a society; and the politics, an emancipation process that consists in a rupture with the logic of the police. The political conflict appears through the manifestation of a new proposal of the distribution of the sensible that aims to redefine those visible and those invisible, those that have the right to speak and those that have not. In that sense, this is a dispute about the distribution of the sensible, which is the aesthetics of politics that manifests itself through the acts of subjectivation that redefine the organization of the common. In light of the above, the objective of this dissertation is to analyze the events that took place during the 2013 protests in Brazil and try to comprehend in what ways this can be understood as a political moment. Two narratives appear from those events: the traditional media s narrative and the narrative of the protesters. They represent fictions that, according to Rancière s definition, are conceptions of the common that define the speakable, the feasible and the possible. The argument here supported is that the fiction of the police s logic is represented in the narrative of the traditional media; meanwhile, the protesters narrative corresponds to the politics fiction. In conclusion, this dissertation will contrast these two narratives, highlighting the ways in which each of then points towards a different proposal for the distribution of the sensible, and how the political process occurs from this dispute.