The Unpartisan School movement (Escola sem Partido, EsP) movement, founded in 2004 with an ideology contrary to what it calls leftist and communist indoctrination in the country s schools, gained visibility in the educational debate in 2014, by incorporating the fight against the supposed gender ideology. The EsP grew in a socio-political context of reaction to the conquest of rights and the advancement of public policies sensitive to social movements and the poorest strata of societies, in the context of what has been called Brazilian neoconservatism. The movement approached the Christian right and was part of Jair Bolsonaro s presidential campaign. This research aimed to investigate the EsP narratives about the teaching of History, especially those related to human differences in time (religion, ethnic-racial differences, gender relations and sexualities). We start from the assumption that the discipline of History occupies a fruitful space in the production of subjects and that, since the 1990s, it has been questioned by social movements that aim to include new subjects, histories, places, and temporalities in the construction of the idea of nation and in the production of subjectivities. Regarding the methodology, we searched for publications available on the EsP website that address the academic and/or school discipline of History and its relations with differences. In this way, 61 publications were selected and analyzed in their content that discussed different religiosities, ethnic-racial and gender relations, sexualities and in the past. The results show that these publications: 1) are mostly opposed to teaching practices, textbooks, faculties and competitions around the discipline of History; 2) criticize what they consider to be a hegemony of Marxism in History; 3) defend the Catholic Church in temporalities such as the Crusades and the Inquisition, and the Christians, especially the Jesuits in the colonization process; 4) seek to distance the Catholic Church from the experiences of slavery; 5) present a moralizing tone when representing women, as well as the construction of a theory that, against the notion of gender, is fixed on the biological as a means of interpreting the roles of men and women in the past, present and for the future. In conclusion, the narratives compiled on the website manifest the reactive character of Brazilian neoconservatism, with a strong moralist, traditional, Christian, heteronormative bias and opposing the demands of women, blacks and LGBTQIA plus. The school subject of History is one of its targets, demonstrating its relevance for the construction and defense of knowledge and values that reinforce the authority of historically dominant groups in Brazilian society.