Are all phenomena that go beyond teacher s and the school s control, from dispersion to mass killings, are these expressions of violence? Many of the facets of violence crossing routine school life have destabilized pedagogical experience and at the same time, have been challenged by the lexical and semantic complexity comprised by the term. We assume that defining school violence, means in reality affirming it as socially constructed, addressed and culturally represented in its own designation. But is it, in the sense that the term is approached /negotiated in the courses of teachers training? If school violence is imminent, how are future teachers trained, today, in light of such challenge? The research has as an objective to contribute with deeper thinking about such questions. We have as objective to get the disputed discourses about the concept and the practices of coping with violence in undergraduate courses. We traced a dialogue between the statute of thought proposed by Hannah Arendt and some researchers of Developmental Psychology, such as Deluty, Del Prette, Vinha, Leme and Vicentin, aiming to collaborate with core foundation of proposals of how to face aggressive and submissive behaviors, expressed by interpersonal conflicts. Regarding the conceptual cutout of the term social violence, we have relied on studies of Velho, Da Matta, Maffesoli, emphasizing Hannah Arendt s contributions. As to the conceptual cutout of the term school violence, we dock theoretically in Debarbieux, Itani, Charlot, Arroyo, Abramovay e Candau. A qualitative research was performed in three Higher Education Institutions in Rio de Janeiro: PUC-Rio, UFRJ e UERJ. At first, we analized the curricula and the syllabus of the Philosophy and Sociology Courses of those three institutions. Subsequently, based on Bardin s methodology of analysis of content, we interviewed 18 undergraduate students and 2 teachers, aiming to confirm the real operation of the contents proclaimed. Some considerations were raised: (1) the lack of distinction between the terms violence and others, employed as its synonyms, may make it part of a segregated category of a group labeled as violent offender; (2) the new facets of violence that arise contemporaneously in schools, corroborate the weaknesses of the public in which the school presently seeks to meet. (3) the problem of violence is interrelated to teachers authority crisis when it is not far from an authoritarian act; (4) the lack of discussion about violence in schools, evident in the teachers training courses promotes the neglect of the subject and may also constitute as one of the propelling factors for the index of 75 percent of drop put in the undergraduate programs, according to INEP. Finally, it became clear, the IES s urgency for assuming and facing the destabilization provoked by the question of violence and the promotion of a space and time dedicated for the practice of thought in schools may constitute a possibility of this confrontation.