| Título: | A NATION PRISONER OF THE DISCOURSE: THE CHINESE DOMINATION OF TIBET | ||||||||||||
| Autor(es): |
CATARINA PERES GAMA LOPES DA COSTA |
||||||||||||
| Colaborador(es): |
DANIEL MAURICIO CAVALCANTI DE ARAGÃO - Orientador |
||||||||||||
| Catalogação: | 28/ABR/2025 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||
| Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | SENIOR PROJECT | ||||||||||
| Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
| Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/TFCs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=70104@1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/TFCs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=70104@2 |
||||||||||||
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.70104 | ||||||||||||
| Resumo: | |||||||||||||
|
This monograph suggests an argue with the speech of China in relation to
Tibet. It is made up according to features and peculiarities that are formed
all along an hierarchisation and consolidation process of political identities.
Since China’s occupation of Tibet in 1949, the discussion, that comprises
the affair of boundaries, sovereignty and textual production, has been
strengthened. These concepts are analyzed by modern authors that are
quoted in the work in an theoretical analysis. Official documents are used
by way of empirical reflection, as well as newspaper articles and speeches
by both government members. This pattern of study is justified as it makes
possible a better understanding of the proposed subject and method by
reader. Furthermore, the basis of this work is on the proposition that the
Chinese speech of control over Tibet is made real in government practices
of China Popular Republic all along its history and in consequence in the
shaping of a speech of resistance from Tibet and other states that support it.
Thus a struggle of a nation inside other is developed, which turns out to be,
in the international system, as through a magnifying glass which matches
the domination speech of China.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||