TRABALHOS DE FIM DE CURSO @PUC-Rio
| Título: | THE DICHOTOMY BETWEEN THE PRINCIPLE OF MANDATORY CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND NEGOTIATED JUSTICE: A SUMMARY ANALYSIS OF THE RISKS TO THE GUARANTEE SYSTEM | ||||||||||||
| Autor(es): |
SAMARA DOSSANTOS FRANCA |
||||||||||||
| Colaborador(es): |
VICTORIA AMALIA DE BARROS CARVALHO GOZDAWA DE SULOCKI - Orientador |
||||||||||||
| Catalogação: | 09/SET/2024 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||
| Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | SENIOR PROJECT | ||||||||||
| Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
| Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/TFCs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=67912@1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/TFCs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=67912@2 |
||||||||||||
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.67912 | ||||||||||||
| Resumo: | |||||||||||||
|
This paper aims to analyze the fracture in the accusatory system caused by the
introduction of negotiated criminal justice mechanisms, facilitated by the mitigation
of the principle of mandatory criminal prosecution. To this end, it characterizes the
Brazilian criminal procedural system from the origins of the Code of Criminal
Procedure to significant modifications found in the rulings of ADI Nos. 6.298, 6.299,
6.300, and 6.305. Following this, considerations are made regarding the principle of
mandatory prosecution, as well as its importance to the criminal process as an
instrument of guarantees. Finally, Brazilian depenalization mechanisms are
presented, and the dichotomy between the principle of mandatory prosecution and
negotiated justice is analyzed.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||