Título: | REGULATION AND QUALITY CONTROL AS SAFEGUARDS AGAINST COUNTERFEIT DRUGS. CASE STUDY: ANALYTICAL METHODS APPLICABLE TO ANTICANCER SUBSTANCES | |||||||
Autor: |
ANA CATALINA PALACIOS OSORIO |
|||||||
Colaborador(es): |
MAURICIO NOGUEIRA FROTA - Orientador RICARDO QUEIROZ AUCELIO - Coorientador ALESSANDRA LICURSI MAIA CERQUEIRA DA CUNHA - Coorientador |
|||||||
Catalogação: | 13/JAN/2010 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
|||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | |||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
|||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=14928&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=14928&idi=2 [es] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=14928&idi=4 |
|||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.14928 | |||||||
Resumo: | ||||||||
The objective of this dissertation is to study regulatory and quality
control aspects to tackle medicines’ counterfeiting in Guatemala. The
motivation to reinforce Guatemala’s National Quality System by identifying
vulnerabilities in the country’s pharmaceutical regulatory system has led
the Guatemalan Finance Ministry to seek cooperation. The Postgraduate
Programme in Metrology for Quality and Innovation of the Catholic University
of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) offered the infrastructure within the context of
quality control assessment to carry out this investigation. The methodology
includes a literature survey to investigate the main themes of this work, and
a case study to assess analytical methods to identify and quantify the content
of camptothecin and its derivatives (irinotecan and topotecan) used in cancer
treatment. A comparison between the Brazilian and Guatemalan regulatory
framework was made. A critical evaluation of the analytical methods applied
to the above mentioned substances was made. Conclusions have shown that
vulnerabilities in the regulatory framework favor the manufacturing, trade
and indiscriminate use of counterfeit drugs. Furthermore, analytical methods
play an important role in its characterization. Capillary electrophoresis and
espectrofluorimetric proved to be more efficient than other methods for
determining counterfeit or substandard drugs of the substances studied. Most
scientific studies indicate a wide range of validation parameters, but only one
of them mentioned the uncertainty associated with the analytical signal of the
analites of interest.
|
||||||||