Título: | THE INVENTION OF BISPO DO ROSARIO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autor: |
CECILIA GUSMAO WELLISCH |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
PINA MARIA ARNOLDI COCO - Orientador |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 13/SET/2006 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=9000&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=9000&idi=2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.9000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A invenção de Bispo do Rosario, by potentializing possible
senses of the
word invention, evokes the creative act and the discovery,
as operations of the
author and the reader (receiver), simultaneously. By this
way, Bispo do Rosario is
seen as an inventor and as an object of invention. In the
scope of the object of
invention, are projected the adventure of the discovery
and of the translation
of his world, engendered by the filter of the reading, not
only as an other text, but
as an other reality, emphasizing the conception of the
deed as surface of alteration.
This work is organized in three tomes: the first one
relates to the invention
of a fictional place, in which occurs the encounter of
Arthur Bispo do Rosario,
Antonin Artaud - who is visited by the theoretical
approach of some important
questions - and Cecilia, the blind. The encounter of these
three characters,
considering the theatrical performance, will put into play
subjects like
representation, authority of language and creative potence.
The second one tells the history of the invention of
Arthur Bispo do
Rosario as an artist, introduced in the sphere of the Fine
Arts by the critic and art
historian Frederico Morais. The trajectory to legitimate
Bispo as an artist is
considered through the analysis of press publications
together with some
interviews, which were realized specifically to focus the
strategic points awoken
by the reading of the selected materials.
In the last tome, Arthur Bispo do Rosario is apprehended
as an inventor of
a expressive universe, in the perspective of my analysis,
stressing, in this way, the
irrevocable mark of the writing as an invention.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|