Título: | THE JUDICIAL PUBLIC SPHERE: THE PARTICIPATION OF JUDICIARY IN DEMOCRATIC SPHERE BY WAY OF COMMUNICATIVE ACTION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autor: |
MARIA CANDIDA GOMES DE SOUZA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
GISELE GUIMARAES CITTADINO - Orientador |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 09/JAN/2006 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=7662&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=7662&idi=2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.7662 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The analysis of the ballast and dimension of the Judiciary
while democratic instance and of how the opening of its
access and the revision of its role can contribute to the
exercise of democracy were the nodal points of the work
evolved, which consolidates its theoretical basis on the
theory of communicative action of Habermas, seeking to
demonstrate, in a first attempt to experiment its
categories to the praxis which results from the inter
action of the Special Judiciaries with the Consumer´s
Defense Code (Law 9099/95 and Law 8078/90), how they can
perform as instruments of democracy in judicial public
sphere. In the development of the subject we pose the
process in such a manner as to reproduce the enormous
differences and conflicts found out in social environment,
and as a conductor of necessities and social expectations,
also finding a peculiar form of society´s political
participation through the Judiciary, argumentative stage
for the reaching of agreements, which may express a result
of a deliberative but not decisive nature. Also it was
sought to demonstrate how process can be put into action
so as to permit, within the scope of that
institutionalized sphere, a greater effectiveness of
fundamental rights, the equalization of syntonies which
would permit a reduction of judicial inequalities inherent
in social reality, operating the transformation of legal
equality to material one, at the procedural level, and
how, reflexively, this can reach concrete pan-
prosecutional results. It was also noticed by the dynamics
of the two micro-systems and their results the potential
capacity of propitiating the affectiveness of alterity
sentiment, albeit tenuous, of those auto-referential
subsystems referred to by Habermas, which oppose society
as supreme forces of domination in present days. It was
also sought to unveil a new interaction among the
Judiciary, democracy and social participation, mainly as
collectivized individualities, which might potentialize
the resistances and create short cuts to the
accomplishment of the values which permeate the contexture
of their longing for equality and dignity. In a
disbelieving world crowded with complexities and multiple
problems, which, more and more, globally affect the
destinies and the remotest realities, any path leading to
reflection and criticism, even through the re-reading of a
Power of State, creates, itself, a finality, by putting on
the stage a public discussion of the legitimate
expectations of society.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|