Título: | HISTORY AND THE DIALOGUE WE ARE: REINHART KOSELLLECK S HISTORIOGRAPHY AND HANS-GEORG GADAMER S HERMENEUTICS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autor: |
LUISA RAUTER PEREIRA |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
ANTONIO EDMILSON MARTINS RODRIGUES - Orientador |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 05/OUT/2005 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=7199&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=7199&idi=2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.7199 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dissertation looks into the various aspects of relations between Reinhart Koselleck s history of concepts and Hans-Georg Gadamer s philosophical hermeneutics. By proposing to interpret Koselleck s work
in the light of inquiries made by hermeneutics philosophy, we intend to comprehend and bring into question one form of historical knowledge that is based upon the dialogue and the link between past and present, with a view to opening up new horizons and prospects of future. Such purpose is well served by Koselleck s historical studies, be it through their theoretical ties with the Heideggerian philosophy or
their insertion into the political and social questions of his days, whereas they also make up a major
discussion topic within our discipline. These authors strong argument on the fundamentals of historical knowledge shows not only dissent, but a wide field of consent as well, which will both be approached here. Authors ideas are of much interest just when historical science increasingly seems to state its purpose as an inquiry into historical otherness. The relation between history and philosophy may
disclose interesting prospects for the discipline, which has greatly experienced the impact of anthropological trends in the latest decades.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|