Título: | CONCEPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SELF-MANAGING GROUPS: ANALYSIS OF TWO INDUSTRIAL CASES | |||||||
Autor: |
JACILEIDE DE ALMEIDA SERAFIM |
|||||||
Colaborador(es): |
MARCIA CRISTINA ESTEVES AGOSTINHO - Orientador |
|||||||
Catalogação: | 29/AGO/2005 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
|||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | |||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
|||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=6956&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=6956&idi=2 |
|||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.6956 | |||||||
Resumo: | ||||||||
The present dissertation aims at identifying and
understanding the process of
conception and implementation of self-managing groups in
production.
Following the methodology of case study, the experiences of
two companies are
observed: AmBev and Michelin. The main intent is to
understand each approach,
describing the organizational context before the changes
towards self-managing
groups and also the key steps for implementing the new
model. Then, the two
cases are comparatively interpreted, leading to some
conclusions about what
should be the most important factors to be taken into
account when implementing
self-managing groups. It is worth noting that, in both
companies, the conception
of the respective models emerges from observations of a
variety of concrete cases
related to the experiences of other plants or companies.
They were hardly
influenced by theory. Although the two approaches share
many similar steps,
some significant differences can be highlighted. Finally,
such similarities and
differences are analyzed in order to grasp factors that can
induce or constrain the
development of self-managing groups.
|
||||||||