Título: | COMPARING ULTRASOUND AND SHEAROGRAPHY INSPECTIONS AS METHODS TO MONITOR AND PREDICT LONG-TERM DAMAGE PROPAGATION OF COMPOSITE PIPELINE REPAIRS | ||||||||||||
Autor: |
BRUNO JORDAO LOPES |
||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
JOSE ROBERTO MORAES D ALMEIDA - Orientador DANIEL CARLOS TAISSUM CARDOSO - Coorientador |
||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 30/OUT/2023 | Língua(s): | ENGLISH - UNITED STATES |
||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=64529&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=64529&idi=2 |
||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.64529 | ||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||
Pipeline integrity is one of the key aspects for safe and efficient operation of
offshore structures. Pipeline failures can result in significant economic and
environmental consequences, making pipeline integrity management a top priority for
the industry. One of the most effective tools for managing in-service pipelines is non-destructive testing (NDT). In this study, ultrasound and shearography inspections were
performed on composite pipeline repairs over the course of approximately two years
and their results were compared. The test samples evaluated were steel pipes with
composite repairs and were submitted to just over 13,500 hours of salt-spray
accelerated ageing, under three different temperatures. Test samples were removed
from the salt-spray chambers at regular intervals and inspected by using field inspection
apparatus. The results showed that both techniques provided consistent results between
each inspection, although not always being consistent with each other. Maps comparing
detections and accuracy of each technique were provided. The feasibility of each
technique as a field tool for monitoring pipeline integrity was also evaluated with
positive results. Furthermore, a modified Arrhenius methodology was proposed as a
first step towards predicting long-term damage propagation.
|
|||||||||||||
|