Título: | MINERAL MACHINES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN THE POETICS OF AMILCAR DE CASTRO AND JOÃO CABRAL DE MELO NETO | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autor: |
ANA BEATRIZ TEIXEIRA DOMINGUES DUARTE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
CECILIA COTRIM MARTINS DE MELLO - Orientador |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 11/ABR/2005 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=6265&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=6265&idi=2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.6265 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bringing together Amilcar de Castro and João Cabral de Melo
Neto, who never
met, although contemporaries and who shared tastes in art,
is to correct a project
that History forgot to finish. One of the aspects that
bring João Cabral closer to
Amilcar de Castro is the privilege of the visual in his
poetry, which takes the
words because of their materiality of pen on paper.
Amilcar, in turn, explores the
metalanguage of sculpture, bringing to the fore aspects
such as weight and
achievement of the third dimension. The comparative method,
which is the very
technique of Cabralian similes, helps us to match the
constructive project present
in both, but which in Amilcar adopts the peculiarities of
neo-concrete rupture.
Finally, the phenomenological approach leads us to discover
in the fold - literal
in Amilcar and in the form of an inner dismantling of the
word` in Cabral - the
fundamental contribution for the shared project of
perverting human perception.
To promote such a meeting between this sculptor and this
poet is, first and
foremost, and ignoring the notorious differences, to assert
the similarities that the
hairsplitting Cabral, critic of the museum of everything
and everyone, failed to
make.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|