Corporate Governance as a topic has received a lot of attention in recent years, especially after the corporate scandals that have become famous in recent decades around the world. In Brazil, the diversion of function schemes discovered in 2014 hit several corporations, especially the large public companies formerly known as national Brazilian rides. Studies show that having an independent board of directors based on established precepts brings greater confidence to investors and generates better results for the company. Even better if the board has the vision to look outside and think about the future. Therefore, this work intends to understand how this important governance tool is used in organizations, comparing boards of directors of the Novo Mercado and the federal government during three Brazilian governments in the post-Lava-Jato period. The study, finally, seeks to understand if/which companies have a strategic character. For this purpose, analyzes of each minutes of several board meetings were carried out, collecting key data from different companies, separating them into different clusters by different governments, and analyzing the composition and behavior of each cluster with regard to the number of strategies addressed. Thus, the result is that the composition of directors of companies does not vary as much as previously thought, either between different governments or between companies with different levels of shareholding control. However, it is also observed that the boards of mixed companies are, in fact, less strategic than the others.