Título: | HERO AND MODERN SCIENCE: MYTHS THAT CONSTITUTE THE COLONIAL POLITICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL HEGEMONY | ||||||||||||
Autor: |
TATIANA CASTELO BRANCO DORNELLAS |
||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
MARTA REGINA FERNANDEZ Y GARCIA MORENO - Orientador |
||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 06/MAI/2021 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=52583&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=52583&idi=2 |
||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.52583 | ||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||
This work aims at discussing the relation between a narrative that transforms the European colonizer into a hero and the development of de so-called modern science as the only legitimate (and universal) way of producing knowledge. To do so, I take the hero journey described by Joseph Campbell (2007 [1949]) as an exemplary narrative, understanding that Campbell s work a) touches the psychological (unconscious/subconscious) construction of the character, from a psychanalytic view, and b) as an American scholar, we find him in the same record as the global north colonizers. Furthermore, I understand that both this hero and the modern science are myths inscribed within Modernity, also understood as a myth (Dussel, 1993), which in turn would be directly associated with Iberian colonization of America – I depart from America s discovery (1942) as the fundamental benchmark of Modernity. I intend to develop this discussion in light of the post-colonial e decolonial theoretical framework, understanding that the similarities that approximate them are more important than the differences – being the most important difference the mark of the beginning of colonialism: for the former, it would be the after Enlightenment, whereas for the latter would be America s discovery (Mignolo, 2000) – composing, thus, a critical and professedly political thought, despite the Western ontology, that is white and allegedly universal and neutral. Once I depart from the idea that the hero, the modern science and the modernity-coloniality (Dussel, 1993) are co-constitutives, these three elements are transversal in this work, touched by the race and gender dimensions, which highlight the most violent aspect of the analyzed objects.
|
|||||||||||||
|