Título: | POLARIZATION AND CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL MOVEMENTS IN BRAZIL AND FRANCE | ||||||||||||
Autor: |
DANIEL FASSA EVANGELISTA |
||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
ANGELA MARIA DE RANDOLPHO PAIVA - Orientador |
||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 29/DEZ/2020 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=51055&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=51055&idi=2 |
||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.51055 | ||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||
Polarization is one of the main features of the cycle of protests
experienced by Brazil since 2013. In this exploratory thesis, we seek to
understand its roots, through dialogue with members of the Free Pass Movement
(Movimento Passe Livre), which triggered the June 2013 demonstrations, and the
Free Brazil Movement (Movimento Brasil Livre), one of the protagonists of the
demonstrations for the impeachment of Dilma Rousseff between 2015 and 2016.
In addition, members of two French movements are interviewed: as in Brazil,
there is a leftist movement, Nuit Debout, and one on the right, La Manif pour
Tous. The interviews are articulated around the interpretation of the activists
regarding the categories liberty, equality and fraternity, with particular attention to
the relationship of these concepts with reciprocal tolerance. The analysis is carried
out through the theoretical-methodological apparatus of sociology of
experience, by François Dubet, based on the assumption that the actors are
capable of reflexivity. In addition to providing knowledge of four different
political identities within the left-right spectrum, the comparison of the interviews
shows that the actors, despite clear differences, have in common the general
dissatisfaction with the political establishment, but are ambiguous about the
legitimacy of their opponents.
|
|||||||||||||
|