Organizational routines are a central element in organizations; a large part of the work is performed through routines (FELDMAN, 2000). Routines impact organizational performance, and are an important source of endogenous change (CACCIATORI, 2012). A number of artifacts can be associated with organizational routines. Many of these artifacts are referred to as technological artifacts, and are related to information technology, such as ERP systems (Entreprise Resource Planning) (D ADDERIO, 2003). Organizational routines can be studied through their ostensive (abstract), performative (specific actions) and artifacts (physical manifestations of routines) (PENTLAND and FELDMAN, 2005). The role of technology can also be perceived in the construction and development of collective competences, through learning and interactions within the communities of practice (HSIAO et al., 2006), or by transferring skills in the management of technological change (BARBAROUX and GODÉ, 2012). Retour and Krohmer (2005) offer a proposal for the study of collective competences, through the articulation between four constituent attributes (common referential, shared language, collective memory and subjective engagement). Other works bring the identification of collective competences through these attributes (PAUVERS and BIENFAIT, 2011; COLIN and GRASSER, 2011), but are not related to the direct or indirect action of the technological component. This study aims to investigate the influence of a technological artifact on organizational routines and, as a result, on the attributes of the collective competencies of the organization. Thus, the research question is: how can the insertion of a technological artifact (re) configure organizational routines and consequently impact the attributes of collective competencies in an organization.? The methodological proposal consists of a case study (YIN, 2010), based on a federal public institution of education. It is a complex organization, regulated, distributed and with a heterogeneous historical formation of its units, and that goes through a unique moment, with the implantation of a large technological artifact (named Projeto Conecta), causing changes in every organizational structure. The research was carried out from 25 semi-structured interviews, obtained in five units of the institution, located in four different cities in Minas Gerais from March to May 2016. The delimitation was given from a project of implantation of a new artifact The whole institution. Data were analyzed using a qualitative, interpretive approach using the content analysis technique (BARDIN, 1977). The results evidenced not only a modification, but also a re-signification of the routines from the insertion of the new technological artifact. This re-signification of routines also brought impacts at different levels for each attribute of collective competencies, also suggesting a possible re-signification of these competencies. The relationships between the analyzed elements constitute a conceptual map, constructed from the following general categories: description of the routines of the study, normalization of the routines, artifact in the action of the routines, reconfiguration of the routines by the artifact, action of the routines in the common reference, action of the routines in the shared language, action of the routines in the collective memory, action of the routines in the subjective engagement.