ETDs @PUC-Rio
| Título: | PERFORMANCE IN LONG TERM OF THE SHARES OF BRAZILIAN FAMILY COMPANIES THAT OPENED CAPITAL BETWEEN 2007 AND 2012 | ||||||||||||
| Autor: |
YURI LEAL NUNES |
||||||||||||
| Colaborador(es): |
GRAZIELA XAVIER FORTUNATO - Orientador |
||||||||||||
| Catalogação: | 12/DEZ/2018 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||
| Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||
| Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
| Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=35837&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=35837&idi=2 |
||||||||||||
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.35837 | ||||||||||||
| Resumo: | |||||||||||||
|
This study aims to analyze the performance of Brazilian family companies, which opened capital between 2007 and 2012 through the performance of actions from the year 2013 to 2017, since the discourse on the performance of these companies is controversial due to the problems of professionalization and
corporate governance, for example. Based on studies conducted in other countries, it was tested whether Brazilian family companies perform better in the Brazilian stock market (BOVESPA) than non-family companies that also opened equity in the same period. CAPM was used as a method to estimate the expected return and to compare with the real return of the shares of family and non-family companies. The results indicate that among the companies analyzed, the family members obtained better results, even though there was no difference in the risk and return relationship presented by companies of both groups.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||