Título: | A DYNAMIC INTEGRATION MODEL FOR SOFTWARE COMPONENT SYSTEMS | ||||||||||||
Autor: |
RENATO FONTOURA DE GUSMAO CERQUEIRA |
||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
ROBERTO IERUSALIMSCHY - Orientador |
||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 30/JUL/2002 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=2792&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=2792&idi=2 |
||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.2792 | ||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||
Different component systems, such as CORBA, COM, and Java,
have different object models and
type systems. Such differences make the interoperability
between components of distinct systems
more difficult, and thus are an obstacle for component
reuse.
In this dissertation, we argue that an interpreted
language with a specific set of reflexive mechanisms,
together with a type system with structural compatibility,
offers a composition mechanism
suitable for dynamic component connection and for
interoperability between different component
systems. This composition mechanism performs at runtime
the tasks of verifying types, connecting,
adapting and implementing components, and handles
components of different systems in a uniform
way, allowing them to be connected transparently.
The proposed composition mechanism is based on a model
that favors flexibility at runtime. This
composition model is composed of two major elements. The
first one is an object model, defined in
order to represent components of the different systems
addressed in this dissertation. Thus, this object
model performs the role of a unifying model, that is, a
model in which objects from different systems
can interact and be represented transparently.
The second element of our composition model is a design
pattern to implement bindings between
interpreted languages and component systems. This design
pattern, named Dynamic Language Binding,
does not use the traditional stubs technique. Instead of
this, it uses reflection and dynamic typing
to implement generic proxies, which can represent any
component of a specific system, and generic
adapters, which allow component implementations using the
composition language itself.
In order to validate our proposal, we describe the LuaOrb
system, which is an implementation
of our composition model. LuaOrb uses the interpreted
language Lua as its dynamic composition
language, and integrates the systems CORBA, COM and Java.
|
|||||||||||||
|