Título: | INTERPRETATIONS OF BRAZIL, CONTEMPORARY (DE)FORMATIONS | |||||||
Autor: |
VICTOR COUTINHO LAGE |
|||||||
Colaborador(es): |
ROBERT BRIAN JAMES WALKER - Orientador |
|||||||
Catalogação: | 11/OUT/2016 | Língua(s): | ENGLISH - UNITED STATES |
|||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | |||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
|||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=27613&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=27613&idi=2 |
|||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.27613 | |||||||
Resumo: | ||||||||
The dissertation deals with writings from the XX century grouped under the
notion of interpretations of Brazil , focusing on their uses of the concept of
formation . I have identified five traces exposed in those uses: (1) the centrality of
the nation; (2) the incompleteness of the transition from the colonial to the modern
condition, marking a coexistence of the old and the new; (3) the internal inequality
within the country; (4) the mobilization of external parameters in the definition of
Brazil; and (5) the focus on the specificities of Brazilian formative process. These
five traces are shared by all the texts selected; but, at the same time, they are
expressed in different ways according to each text. Part I stresses the recurrence of
the concept of formation in the interpretations of Brazil (chapter 2); after that,
it lays out general lines of the perspective from which the uses of formation will
be interpreted in the texts selected (chapter 3). Part II (chapters 4-12) is devoted to
the interpretations of the texts, focusing on the uses of formation and those five
traces previously mentioned. Part III begins with a controversy that took place
mainly in the late 1980s and that is expressive of many aspects raised in Part II
(chapter 13); then, it tackles three interpreters of Brazil that have advanced, in
different ways, efforts similar to the one I will embrace myself in the last part of the
text, that is, an alternative interpretation of the formation of contemporary Brazil
from some kind of engagement with previous interpretations of Brazil (chapters
14-16). Finally, Part IV (chapter 17) builds on the previous discussion, in order to
reflect upon, or theorize from, the five traces of formation in the interpretations
of Brazil .
|
||||||||