Título: | ANALYZING, COMPARING AND RECOMMENDING CONFERENCES | ||||||||||||
Autor: |
GRETTEL MONTEAGUDO GARCÍA |
||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
MARCO ANTONIO CASANOVA - Orientador |
||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 06/SET/2016 | Língua(s): | ENGLISH - UNITED STATES |
||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=27295&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=27295&idi=2 |
||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.27295 | ||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||
This dissertation discusses techniques to automatically analyze, compare
and recommend conferences, using bibliographic data, outlines an implementation
of the proposed techniques and describes experiments with data extracted from a
triplified version of the DBLP repository. Conference analysis applies statistical
and social network analysis measures to the co-authorship network. The
techniques for comparing conferences explore familiar similarity measures, such
as the Jaccard similarity coefficient, the Pearson correlation similarity and the
cosine similarity, and a new measure, the co-authorship network communities
similarity index. These similarity measures are used to create a conference
recommendation system based on the Collaborative Filtering strategy. Finally, the
work introduces two techniques for recommending conferences to a given
prospective author based on the strategy of finding the most related authors in the
co-authorship network. The first alternative uses the Katz index, which can be
quite costly for large graphs, while the second one adopts an approximation of the
Katz index, which proved to be much faster to compute. The experiments suggest
that the best performing techniques are: the technique for comparing conferences
that uses the new similarity measure based on co-authorship communities; and the
conference recommendation technique that explores the most related authors in
the co-authorship network.
|
|||||||||||||
|