There are several software development technologies currently in the literature. Two such technologies are object orientation, which is consolidated, and agent orientation, which has been the subject of many studies and experiments. These studies indicate the agent orientation as very promising and an evolution of object orientation. However, there is only a few studies comparing these two techniques and these studies have been based on ideological and qualitative comparisons. This dissertation aims to develop and evaluate methods of systematic evaluation of two architectures for implementing systems. The two technologies presented were compared and determined whether the use of technology has brought benefits, disadvantages or was indifferent to the other. The comparison was performed based on taking a real problem; in other words, two implementations have been created that address the problem similarly each using a technology. To develop this work, it was created a measurement plan based on the technique Goal Question Metric. The measurement plan was applied to both implementations and results were evaluated by defining the benefits of each technique. Finally was done a discussion about the use of the GQM model in a real project.