Título: | RUPTURE AND PERMANENCE: THE ANTILIBERAL TENDENCIES OF UDENISM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Autor: |
JORGE GOMES DE SOUZA CHALOUB |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
GISELE GUIMARAES CITTADINO - Orientador |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 25/JAN/2010 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=15042&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=15042&idi=2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.15042 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Udenism doesn’t finish in UDN. It isn’t just a party ideology, but an
ensemble of political practices and beliefs, who has strongly determined a certain
party acts and ideas, but not just that. Only referring to UDN this amount of
practices and ideas becomes a define ideology, nevertheless their consequences
certainly surpass it. In fact, it’s an ideology trespass by profound ambiguities,
bigger than the traditional division between theory and practice. Beyond the
conjunction between authoritarian practices and liberal discourse, udenist’s actors
reveal conflicts in their acts’ core, and contradictory theoretical beliefs. This
work looks for some reasons of those conflicts, based at udenism insertion in
Brazilian political thought tradition. Determined by different influences, udenism
reveals itself as an ideology divided, who utilizes its great opponent arguments,
Vargas’s instrumental authoritharism, as its main political practice. Ambiguity
isn’t only accidental, it defines the udenism’s core. This work aims to define not
only the authoritarian concept’s use, identified with a certain first Republic
tradition, but also to investigate such practices’ motives and consequences, vital
task for a adequate view of Brazilian’s politics between 1946-1964.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|