Título: | DEMOCRACY, JUSTIFICATION AND COMUNICATION: NOTES ABOUT A BRAZIL OF SOCIAL INEQUALITIES | ||||||||||||
Autor: |
PEDRO FEDERICI ARAUJO |
||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
FLORIAN FABIAN HOFFMANN - Orientador BETHANIA DE ALBUQUERQUE ASSY - Coorientador |
||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 29/JUN/2021 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=53453&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=53453&idi=2 |
||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.53453 | ||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||
The crisis of exclusive representative democracies is the scenario of this work. Representative democracies are environments for the perpetuation of relations that are not based on communication between State and people. They make the exchange of reasons typical from relations of power impossible. Contexts of representative democracies and social inequalities enable class domination, deny recognition to the poor and harm their political self-recognition, preventing communication between government and citizens. The concepts of communicative action, domination and justification in Habermas and Forst s works are essential to build a democratic paradigm based on intersubjective relations. It is not intended to present a rightful/truthful concept of democracy. The aim is to analyze social and political contexts that discredit the democratic system and strengthen domination structures and strategic action that are incompatible with democracy. Starting at the point where democracies must comply with justice and communication standards based on intersubjective ethics. It cannot favor strategic action and sustain non-recognition and domination structures. In this sense, the adoption of direct participation mechanisms are able to amplify democratic feature of the system, enabling the reduction of strategic action cleaning the path for a communicative action. As well of allowing the shift from relations of domination to relations of power, granting intersubjective recognition. In addition, they foment spaces of encounter and conflict as interaction between strangers. It is possible that it concurs to the amplification of the dialogue and the reduction of non-representative structures that are not responsives.
|
|||||||||||||
|