Título: | WHAT BURNS, THE WORK OF FIRE AND THE ASHES: AN ANALYSIS OF THE MAM FIRE | ||||||||||||
Autor: |
FELIPE PARANAGUA BRAGA |
||||||||||||
Colaborador(es): |
LUIZ CAMILLO DOLABELLA PORTELLA OSORIO DE ALMEIDA - Orientador |
||||||||||||
Catalogação: | 31/MAI/2021 | Língua(s): | PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL |
||||||||||
Tipo: | TEXT | Subtipo: | THESIS | ||||||||||
Notas: |
[pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio. [en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio. |
||||||||||||
Referência(s): |
[pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=53052&idi=1 [en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=53052&idi=2 |
||||||||||||
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.53052 | ||||||||||||
Resumo: | |||||||||||||
The thesis has as its theme a broad reflection on the fire that occurred in
1978, at the Museum of Modern Art of Rio de Janeiro. It is based on the assumption
that the fire, which destroyed almost its entire collection, could be a symbolic
milestone of the rupture of the modern project that would have MAM as one of its
bases. The modernity model sought by MAM is discussed throughout the text, in
order to formulate and analyze the possibilities of fracture regarding this model. In
its structure, the thesis builds a network of articulations around the condition of ruin
that the fire materializes, addressing cultural and social issues that were dear to
Brazil and the world in the second half of the 1970s. For this purpose, the thesis
was divided into three blocks: What burns, the work of fire and the ashes. The first
block lists the issues related to the modern project, the idea of a modern museum
as a construction of memory of the future, and the conditions of this project s
rupture, based on authors such as Octavio Paz, Artur Danto and Jean-François
Lyotard. The second block discusses projects that reflect the change in perspective
that was underway. Among them, the proposals brought by Mario Pedrosa for
MAM s reconstruction, the postmodern museum of Frederico Morais, and the
printed museum of the Malasartes and A Parte do Fogo magazines. Lastly, the third
block raises the issues of an archive that, as it was ruined, would need to be
reinvented. In this part, fiction emerges as a conceptual strategy to guide the
narrative and fill in certain gaps. Real documents are brought to the fore by
characters such as a blind curator, a distracted archivist and an archivist artist,
discussing the change in the visuality regime that would shape the transition from
modern to contemporary. Following this drift between fiction and reality, artists
Cildo Meireles, Tunga and Artur Barrio have their works analyzed based on aspects
that are detached from a retinal appeal. The text, while discussing new image
production regimes, establishes a parallel between these artists and the history of
the Museum of Modern Art of Rio. In the end, it is established that the change in
perspective from modern to contemporary could not be isolated by a single event,
however, by reinforcing an ongoing rupture, the MAM fire could be considered a
symbolic milestone of this event.
|
|||||||||||||
|