This research is a review of the main education disputes in the field of education in Brazil after the promulgation of the 1988 Constitution. The objective was to map the actors which participate in the field and what are their agenda, in order to analyze the disputes in which they are involved and how the field has been diversifying. The theoretical framework is based in the concept of field of Pierre Bourdieu, that is why the work has a detail analysis about the concepts of this author and its applicability in the Brazilian education field. The chosen method was to notice the speech of the different actors during the approval process of the National Education Plan 2014-2024, because it was the moment when these actors met themselves for discuss the education goals valid for the next ten years and for its news. To understand the actors and the places from where they speak, it was chosen to a study the history of the earlier cases, like the Promulgation of the 1988 Constitution, the approval of the 1996 Law Guidelines and Bases and the National Plan of Education 2001-2010. The second objective of this work was to understand the disputes about scholar education. Lastly, this research tries to understand how the scholar education are disputed between the different actors from different places, from the public and the private sector, and how these relations have become more complex at the last years.