Logo PUC-Rio Logo Maxwell
ETDs @PUC-Rio
Estatística
Título: RIGHT TO HEALTH IN BRAZIL: THE VERIFIED EXCESSES AND THE NECESSITY TO ESTABLISH LIMITS ON THE MATERIAL BENEFITS OF THE STATE
Autor: MARCIO VILLELA MACHADO
Colaborador(es): FABIO CARVALHO LEITE - Orientador
Catalogação: 24/MAR/2011 Língua(s): PORTUGUESE - BRAZIL
Tipo: TEXT Subtipo: THESIS
Notas: [pt] Todos os dados constantes dos documentos são de inteira responsabilidade de seus autores. Os dados utilizados nas descrições dos documentos estão em conformidade com os sistemas da administração da PUC-Rio.
[en] All data contained in the documents are the sole responsibility of the authors. The data used in the descriptions of the documents are in conformity with the systems of the administration of PUC-Rio.
Referência(s): [pt] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=17126&idi=1
[en] https://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/projetosEspeciais/ETDs/consultas/conteudo.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=17126&idi=2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17771/PUCRio.acad.17126
Resumo:
The clamor for ample material realization of social rights in Brazil has reached high levels at the beginning of the XXI century. Once formally approved by the 1988 Federal Constitution as fundamental rights and, therefore, compliance of the fundamental core of our legal system, social rights exceeded the level of political discussion, constituting common object of lawsuits. Increasingly, the Judiciary has to intervene in the process of implementing this kind of rights, leaving an essentially passive and formal stance in favor of increasing intervention in the quality and merit of public policies involved. This phenomenon brings several consequences for legal and factual universes, some of them positive, some negative, being sure that this paper focuses, with special attention, to this second kind. For this, the option is by analysis to the social right to health, seeking to identify major problems that can be extracted from a judicialization that, at various times, can be regarded as excessive and unsystematic. Finally, advocates by the need to establish limits on judicial action that intended to be legitimate, which must be built democratically, dogmatically and based on parameters that take into serious consideration the relativity of rights, their costs, the existential minimum, the respect for constitutional administrative choices and necessity of appropriate balancing of interests, without neglecting the search of greater possible effectiveness of constitutional rules.
Descrição: Arquivo:   
COVER, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, RESUMO, ABSTRACT AND SUMMARY PDF    
CHAPTER 1 PDF    
CHAPTER 2 PDF    
CHAPTER 3 PDF    
CHAPTER 4 PDF    
CHAPTER 5 PDF    
REFERENCES PDF