Architecture between Sculpture: an approach to the artistic dimension of contemporary landscape searches for an approach to works of sculptors and architects, since 1960, in the international circuit, in order to analyze to what extent possible affinities can be traced out between both artistic fields, while facing the challenge in the multiple features of contemporary landscape. The discussion is based on the historian Rosalind Krauss notion of expanded field in which the limits among sculpture, architecture and landscape become flexible, delineating by means of combinations and exclusions, the multiple possibilities of art in dealing with real space. On the same ground, Anthony Vidler, historian of architecture, sustains that while criticizing the traditional matters of sculpture, artists have internalized the issues of architecture themselves, and architects, on the other hand, have searched for the artistic experimental processes to escape from the rigidity of functionalism and typological models. Works by the artists Richard Serra, Christo, Robert Morris, Robert Smithson, Claes Oldenburg and Vito Acconci and by the architects Robert Venturi, Peter Eisenman, Frank Gehry, Zaha Hadid, Daniel Libeskind and Rem Koolhaas, among others, can be described as between and studied as participants in the scope architecture and sculpture and landscape. On such basis one can identify issues such as: externality, relation with the site, monumentality, space-time experience, form and anti form, performance and use of spaces, notions of public and private, image, fiction and history. There occurs the deflagration of a process, both experimental and selfcritical, on the part of each artistic means, through an analysis that interpunctuates the relationship among Modern, Pop, Minimal, Land Art, performances, Deconstructivism and new topologies and architectural programs.