The objective of this research is to understand how emotions and interpersonal relationships of a group of teachers are established when they reflect on their queer performances in life trajectories, especially in professional practices. For this, I analyze and interpret the evaluation (LINDE, 1997; THOMPSON; HUNSTON, 2006; HUNSTON, 2011) and its relation with the discursive construction of emotions (ABU-LUGHOD; LUTZ, 1990; AHMED, 2004; REZENDE; COELHO, 2010) in discourses (FOUCAULT, 1972; PENNYCOOK, 2007; ROCHA, 2020) produced during exploratory conversations (NUNES, 2017) with teachers of Primary Education regarding their queer performances in pedagogical contexts. Pursuing the specific objectives of this research, I intend to create understandings about evaluative discourses that highlight the emotions and disputes of normative ideologies, besides analyzing the micropolitical character of the emotions that arise in such conversations, some of which unfold in narratives (BASTOS; BIAR, 2015) and life stories (LINDE, 1997). Queer must be understood here as acting in a counter-hegemonic way (BUTLER, 1999; CAMERON; KULICK, 2003; BORBA, 2015; BORBA, 2019; MOITA LOPES; PINTO, 2020) and the different ways of manifesting gender, sexuality, and affection in social spaces. Aligned with an autoethnographic methodology (ELLIS; BOCHNER, 2000), I reflect and investigate both my life experiences in relation to the theme of this dissertation, as well as bringing the voices of other teachers who have recently entered the job market in order to better understand our realities. Furthermore, since this research takes part in Queer Linguistics (BORBA, 2019), it intends to question hegemonic and heteronormative discourses, and follows the procedural logic of a qualitative-interpretive research (DENZIN; LINCOLN, 2006). Data were analyzed from the observation of evaluative lexicogrammatical instances and three different layers from the narratives (BIAR et al, 2021): how the text is being constructed, how the interaction takes place and what Discourses (GEE, 2001) are in action. For this purpose, I divide the analysis into three topics: adolescence, the educational institution and the relationship with the students. The results indicate different but intersecting paths. It was possible to identify the emergence of mostly negative evaluations concerning the behavior of others with the teachers who took part in this research and predominantly positive evaluations when they spoke about themselves. At the same time, I could observe emotions of a negative nature, such as insecurity, fear and rejection, and of a positive nature, such as love, hope and pride.