With the increasing use of artificial intelligence in Instagram s content moderation, the company is increasingly criticized for the discriminatory effects of its algorithmic systems, which seem to reveal a hierarchy of humanities within the social network. Even though users self-exposure is the primary source of data used by Instagram in its profit generation, some bodies hold full and unrestricted visibility while others are disproportionately hidden by automated moderation. Algorithmic moderation on the social network integrates a new kind of government of conducts, based on data and statistical correlations, that takes on specific traits with regard to female users. This is a power that, hidden under Instagram s technoutopian and corporatist discourses, does not recognize itself as power and becomes more difficult to detect. There is, however, the possibility of resistance to such government of conduct. While much of the academic work on online resistance is focused on resistance either to interpersonal violence between users or to sexist practices and discourses, the literature on resistance to the power of algorithmic content moderation systems is scarce. This research intends to contribute to the debate on the theme, exploring as a resistance technique or digital selfdefense, the self-exposure of female Instagram users aimed at denouncing the algorithmic power of the social network, especially the silences and discriminations perpetuated by it.