Refinery scheduling can be understood as a set of decisions which aims to optimize resource allocation, task sequencing, and their time-related execution, respecting constraints and targeting multiple objectives. Despite its complexity and combinatorial nature, the refinery scheduling lacks more sophisticated support decision tools. The main systems in the area are worksheets and, sometimes, simulation software. The multiple objectives do not mean they have the same importance. Actually, they can be grouped whereas the objectives related to the refinery production capacity are more important than the ones related to a smooth operation. This thesis proposes the development of multiobjective algorithms applied to crude oil refinery scheduling. The proposals are based on the major technics of multiobjective literature, like Pareto dominance and problem decomposition, integrated with a quantum-inspired genetic programming approach. One and two decision level models are studied. The difference between groups is handled with conditions that define what can be considered a good solution. The effect of using an archive population in the evolutionary process is also evaluated. The results of the proposed models are compared with another model that handles the objectives in a hierarchical logical. Both decomposition and dominance approaches have better results than the hierarchical model. The decomposition model is even better. The bilevel decomposition method is the only one, among two decision levels models, which have shown good performance. In the end, this work achieves more than one multiobjective model able to offer a set of solutions which comprises the critical objectives and can give flexibility to the production scheduler does his analysis. Therefore, he can consider aspects not included in the model, like the forecast of crude oil batches not scheduled yet.