Decision tree construction is a central problem in several areas of computer science, for example, data base theory and computational learning. This problem can be viewed as the problem of evaluating a discrete function, where to check the value of each variable of the function we have to pay a cost, and the points where the function is defined are associated with a probability distribution. The goal of the problem is to evaluate the function minimizing the cost spent (in the worst case or in expectation). In this Thesis, we present four contributions related to this problem. The first one is an algorithm that achieves an O(log(n)) approximation with respect to both the expected and the worst costs. The second one is a procedure that combines two trees, one with worst costW and another with expected cost E, and produces a tree with worst cost at most (1+p)W and expected cost at most (1/(1-e-p))E, where p is a given parameter. We also prove that this is a sharp characterization of the best possible trade-off attainable, showing that there are infinitely many instances for which we cannot obtain a decision tree with both worst cost smaller than (1+p)OPTW(I) and expected cost smaller than (1/(1-e-p))OPTE(I), where OPTW(I) (resp. OPTE(I)) denotes the cost of the decision tree that minimizes the worst cost (resp. expected cost) for an instance I of the problem. The third contribution is an O(log(n)) approximation algorithm for the minimization of the worst cost for a variant of the problem where the cost of reading a variable depends on its value. Our final contribution is a randomized rounding algorithm that, given an instance of the problem (with an additional integer k > 0) and a parameter 0 < e < 1/2, builds an oblivious decision tree with cost at most (3/(1 - 2e))ln(n)OPT(I) and produces at most (k/e) errors, where OPT(I) denotes the cost of the oblivious decision tree with minimum cost among all oblivious decision trees for instance I that make at most k classification errors.