This thesis presents a new sequent calculus called LMT→ that has the properties to be terminating, sound and complete for Propositional Implicational Minimal Logic (M →). LMT→ is aimed to be used for proof search in M →, in a bottom-up approach. Termination of the calculus is guaranteed by a strategy of rule application that forces an ordered way to search for proofs such that all possible combinations are stressed. For an initial formula α, proofs in LMT→ has an upper bound of |α|.2 |α|+1+2·log2|α|, which together with the system strategy ensure decidability. System rules are conceived to deal with the necessity of hypothesis repetition and the contextsplitting nature of → left, avoiding the occurrence of loops and the usage of backtracking. Therefore, LMT→ steers the proof search always in a forward, deterministic manner. LMT→ has the property to allow extractability of counter-models from failed proof searches (bicompleteness), i.e., the attempt proof tree of an expanded branch produces a Kripke model that falsifies the initial formula. Counter-model generation (using Kripke semantics) is achieved as a consequence of the completeness of the system. LMT→ is implemented as an interactive theorem prover based on the calculus proposed here. We compare our calculus with other known deductive systems for M →, especially with Fitting s Tableaux, a method that also has the bicompleteness property. We also proposed here a translation of LMT→ to the Dedukti proof checker as a way to evaluate the correctness of the implementation regarding the system specification and to make our system easier to compare to others.