Aging is a major healthcare challenge worldwide. With aging, the prevalence of conditions such as dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment increase. The most frequent and studied cause of dementia is Alzheimer s dementia (AD). Traditionally, AD is characterized by early deficit in episodic memory. However, current studies show that AD presents heterogeneity in clinical manifestations, especially cognitive manifestations. Thus, some patients present a non-amnestic cognitive profile. These profiles are called by some authors as atypical AD. The first part of this thesis was aimed at studying the neuropsychological heterogeneity in AD by means of 2 studies: a systematic review on neuropsychological heterogeneity in AD (published) and cases of study with typical and atypical AD patients (published). The systematic review was necessary, as it was the first published review about the topic. The findings of the two studies show that atypical aspects in AD need to be further explored, since AD is not a homogeneous condition. Understanding these cognitive profiles in AD will interfere in diagnostic methods and therapeutic interventions, either pharmacological or behavioral ones. The second part of this thesis explores atypical aspects in three samples: normal aging, MCI and AD. Thus, a cross-sectional study was conducted to compare measures of processing speed (PS), inhibitory control, working memory and cognitive flexibility in the three samples. The results of this study showed that PS measures may be early indicators of cognition decline in aging. MCI versus normal aging showed differences in PS measures and errors in tests of PS. However, these samples did not show differences in executive function measures (EFs) and functional measures. Nevertheless, MCI versus AD show differences in PS measures, executive functions and functionality. Thus, this study showed relevant results for the diagnosis process of MCI and new guidelines for clinical settings and research. In addition, in the second part of this thesis an article was written on diagnostic accuracy of the PS measures used in cases of MCI and AD. The literature shows a lack of studies on differences in PS measures in aging and diagnostic parameters of PS instruments. This study showed that PS measures present discriminative abilities in AD and MCI. These data are important, as there is a lack of diagnostic tools for PS in aging, especially in the Brazilian scenario.