This dissertation comprises the evaluation of a new calculation methodology developed to predict the burst pressure of pipeline segments containing corrosion colonies. The new methodology is called Method of Orthogonal Lines Rupture (MLOR). The corrosion colonies are represented by rectangular defects, located on the outer surface of the pipeline segment. The objective of MLOR is to determine more accurate results than those calculated by the semi-empirical methods of ASME and DNV. The MLOR has also the objective of avoiding non-conservative results that can be obtained with the Mixed Type Interacting method (MTI). The MLOR presents a new way to assess the loss of effective thickness of a group of defects. It proposes the drawing of lines parallel to the longitudinal and circumferential directions that intend to represent the path by which the rupture of the pipeline is more likely to occur. These lines are called Orthogonal Lines of Rupture (LOR). It is also considered the employment of a strength circumferential factor f in the calculation of the effective thickness of the colony. This factor multiplies only the lengths of the LOR which are associated with the circumferential direction of the pipeline. Using that, the intact material existing between two defects is considered in the calculation of the rupture resistance. The critical path connects the rectangular defects using lines parallel to the longitudinal and circumferential directions. The evaluation of the MLOR was accomplished by comparing its burst pressure calculations with already published results determined for nine full scale tests carried out with specimens that contained specially designed and constructed colonies of defects. The comparisons encompassed those experimentally published test results and also results determined by numerical simulations that employed the finite element method (ANSYS commercial software). Finally, the dissertation concludes that the MLOR showed good results (maximum average error equal to -0.14 percent and standard deviation of the error equal to 3.53 percent) compared with experimental and numerical results.